Table of contents Recent Federal And History of the Ontario Prohibits SIGNIFICANT OPPORTUNITIES IN THE PROBLEM WITH
|
|
UK: NEW CASINOS ANNOUNCED By Harris Hagan At last there has been a development in relation to the new casinos promised by the Gambling Act 2005 (“the 2005 Act”), passed almost three years ago. Many will recall that the original excitement associated with the advisory body appointed to select the areas for the eight small, eight large and one regional, or so called “super”, casinos, quickly faded to apathy and then towards despair when the Government had another of its (all too frequent in this process) collective nervous breakdowns over gambling policy or perhaps the lack of one. The problem was that the Committee did not follow the political script and chose Manchester instead of Blackpool for the regional casino, a selection which was probably justified on the facts, but was out of step with the views of the less well informed press, and most members of Parliament. The consequence was that when the requisite Order for the 17 new casinos under the 2005 Act was put to Parliament in March 2007, the House of Lords rejected it, not least because it included the regional casino to be located in Blackpool.
|
If you are having problem viewing The Gaming Lawyer, you may access The Gaming Lawyer Forum.
The forum includes all the articles published in The Gaming Lawyer as well as feedback and discussions from the IAGA members.